[lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7069)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 02 August 2022 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498A1C15C517 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sedJU-W4UZWC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78410C15A738 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 2D29B1BA496A; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, housley@vigilsec.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: tunsira15@gmail.com, spasm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220802222116.2D29B1BA496A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 15:21:16 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/1k5LP4H4P_EtUSE0Bf_uTdhMUr0>
Subject: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7069)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:21:20 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649,
"Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7069

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Sira Thampitak <tunsira15@gmail.com>

Section: Global

Original Text
-------------
where Technical is an error in the technical content (This includes changes to the usage of RFC 2119 keywords.) and Editorial is a spelling, grammar, punctuation, or syntax error that does not affect the technical meaning.

Corrected Text
--------------
where Technical is an error in the technical content (This includes changes to the usage of RFC 8649 and Editorial is a spelling, grammar, punctuation, or syntax error that does not affect the technical sup
port 

Notes
-----
Note

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
Publication Date    : August 2019
Author(s)           : R. Housley
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG