[lamps] RFC6844bis: Minor changes; Last Call?

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Wed, 10 October 2018 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4DD12958B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8Bay7mHPnJQ for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85EC51294D7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WYikiPGJtftw4+BDajwJ/tELsKfl9vITaI0nTwzEuZI=; b=rmo/uup+R4TjL+pa8/fzLmWzuj JbhgNgcpAQP3oeAjLQtOs7K8YWy8ducmsrWioUjsZEreBhKXsMExeKAZbR1Gyq9Od0tgcGAflvzrJ Gm82Ba9kdO2n1Hz4uzIf6nVAO4FscPc5zhvMlmpe0DJi3MOvuzpN4tU/O8iXUS6rUbeM=;
Received: ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:40:48 -0700
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <5a0108c7-f256-89ae-9229-86ce3b9fe8c5@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:40:47 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/2jRLvXxyseUu3D4lkKhpFVR9_D4>
Subject: [lamps] RFC6844bis: Minor changes; Last Call?
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:40:50 -0000

I've uploaded a new revision of 6844bis. The changes since the last 
version are pretty minor.

- Incorporated Ilari's whitespace fix to the ABNF 
(https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/current/msg02845.html).
- Made it clear that if the issuevalue doesn't match the ABNF, that 
issue tag doesn't authorize issuance by anyone (and therefore, if it's 
the only issue tag in the resource record set, forbids issuance by 
everyone).

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-01

The diff can be seen at 
https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/commit/65ac0373487733c834c58733963550a9b03fef92.

I think this is ready for Last Call. Russ, what do you think?