Re: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-03-01: (with COMMENT)
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 13:44 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C751200A4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOa_NexVoSEN for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC6BE120094 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 06:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4232300AE3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:25:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rxlS75ZJ7-Y1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:25:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.58.240] (unknown [94.107.234.206]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62D783001F1; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:25:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3367E74@marathon>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 09:44:43 -0400
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DCB92E96-2DBF-4D75-B4DE-7656FA71DB40@vigilsec.com>
References: <155760806741.23982.17913134945724564971.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3367E74@marathon>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/3-T5Lk-KOU4btd4Hf1t5441Tp_8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-03-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 13:44:50 -0000
> On May 16, 2019, at 9:42 AM, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Spasm [mailto:spasm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba via >> Datatracker >> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2019 4:54 PM >> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> >> Cc: spasm@ietf.org; lamps-chairs@ietf.org >> Subject: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-03-01: >> (with COMMENT) >> >> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-ietf-lamps-03-01: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email >> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory >> paragraph, however.) >> >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lamps/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> No objection to the list of work items, but maybe it’s time to rename this >> “AMPS”, as “L” doesn’t seem to apply any more. > > This opens up a debate on the semantics of "limited". I'm not sure it's worth the effort. Another name change would not be helpful. The mail list still has the original name... Russ
- [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter-iet… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter… Barry Leiba
- Re: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter… Salz, Rich
- Re: [lamps] Barry Leiba's No Objection on charter… Tim Hollebeek