Re: [lamps] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update-03: (with COMMENT)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B125013219E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPp6haCwOQjp for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2A4132992 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F8E3005C7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:26:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id iHm8XKWN2hJl for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:26:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 542F330026B; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:26:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <150769502121.24823.6778910805810972408.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:26:27 -0400
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <72EACCDA-E67E-402C-8501-78F3871E3F95@vigilsec.com>
References: <150769502121.24823.6778910805810972408.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/35wc0WPUnPj7XedbFvIiiwuvnds>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 21:26:32 -0000

Thanks.  This is fixed in my edit buffer.

Russ


> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:10 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update-03: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -1.1: Please consider using the boilerplate from 8174. There's at least at
> least one use of a lower-case "should" (in 7.5.1, last paragraph).