IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update-00

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 02 September 2021 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66013A0B21 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PNPg-iMXU0Fm for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58ECC3A0B2A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F72300C1D for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id mB00gR-itX0R for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:30:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39F77300C09; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:30:58 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <PH2P110MB0936C1E4EF223A112C580F77DCCE9@PH2P110MB0936.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 16:30:56 -0400
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DD23A463-8F22-4412-A178-CC4C0C9E0363@vigilsec.com>
References: <PH2P110MB0936C1E4EF223A112C580F77DCCE9@PH2P110MB0936.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/4AwMwGhALhFjqk8olP1dFoscHJw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update-00
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 20:31:04 -0000

Roman:

Thanks.  It seems that a -00 will never make it all the way through the review process.

I've added the sentence to the abstract in my edit buffer.  I'll post it with any other IETF Last Call comment resolutions.

Russ


> On Sep 2, 2021, at 4:22 PM, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I did an AD review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update-00.  Thanks for this maintenance on the registries.  I have no substantive comments and will advance the document to IETF LC.
> 
> One editorial nit to address with other IETF LC feedback from idnits:
> 
>  -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC7299, but the
>     abstract doesn't seem to directly say this.
> 
> Regards,
> Roman
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email