Re: [lamps] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 10 January 2018 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AF312D876; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:10:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xG5-owPjo4RU; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3772912D854; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:10:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1515600606; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=R9hXsDhewT/kKYVlh8av+jzuUkmvrfsh4PGWZxXutXM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=fCC1ZcyiICCokWisc6txIVJ887eEZjJgDW6EEYXjxL6vHLsJK+UIsNRMkvN/i3CBmBe+Lp FMSCoKDDNX+kHzZhUIgKTzpiLp453SlSJoouqaNtWTnGQwUs9CyZdtbUxWGdg5piCPA8If aPO+O0xjmkTPKlkLUSXLLUu7PhOmTB4=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <WlY63QAbSJdR@waldorf.isode.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:10:06 +0000
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <151556057406.21417.16858044663291002517.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2E9CD715-B354-4A68-A9A4-45EB03A18117@vigilsec.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <f03ca844-60fe-42d2-8da8-36333777b5c1@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:09:48 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
In-Reply-To: <2E9CD715-B354-4A68-A9A4-45EB03A18117@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/4MhqI2XcJm4hKpru-W-tHyXK0Fg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:10:10 -0000

Hi,

On 10/01/2018 16:00, Russ Housley wrote:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks for your work on this document. One thing I noticed is that the name for
>> what I presume is an early registration at IANA ("id-on-smtputf8Name") varies
>> from the final name used in this document ("id-on-smtputf8Mailbox"). I would
>> ask the authors and shepherd to please carefully review the final IANA
>> registrations upon document approval to ensure this is updated appropriately.
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.8
>
> At this point, the entry is already in the IANA registry.  I wonder if it is worth the confusion to change it.
If I understood Adam correctly, he is just asking for the label to be 
updated in the registry. That shouldn't be a big deal, right?

Best Regards,
Alexey