[lamps] cryptographic envelope/cryptographic payload in e-mail
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Thu, 19 July 2018 22:13 UTC
Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B278A130E13 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JS4mb5HhG06 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7330130DEB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (dhcp-97d4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.151.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 076B5F99A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:13:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E2B320338; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:00:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: spasm@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:00:33 -0400
Message-ID: <87wotqx4vy.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/5oiEdGnvjK4GuBsxv70AJqfmgDE>
Subject: [lamps] cryptographic envelope/cryptographic payload in e-mail
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 22:13:16 -0000
Russ asked me to send a pointer to my description of the distinction between a "cryptographic envelope" and "cryptographic payload". You can find it online here: https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/blog/e-mail-cryptography.html It also includes discussion of user agent UI/UX concerns, which are not typical IETF fare. And i'm attaching the source markdown so that it's all on IETF infrastructure for discussion as well, but feel free to respond only to the parts that you think are relevant to the IETF. --dkg
- [lamps] cryptographic envelope/cryptographic payl… Daniel Kahn Gillmor