Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D630A130E04 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VYVmrGYRFFK8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out-2.mxes.net (smtp-out-2.mxes.net [67.222.241.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA8B130DBE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Customer-MUA (mua.mxes.net [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC26327517; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR14MB11065365ECA7A71C5B8B0A05835F0@BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 15:17:48 -0400
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <98E04A7B-DFA0-4765-B153-C707F09A31B3@seantek.com>
References: <BN6PR14MB11065365ECA7A71C5B8B0A05835F0@BN6PR14MB1106.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
To: Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
X-Sent-To: <c3Bhc21AaWV0Zi5vcmc=>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/6a0fNt5tA89LE6pL_VZZhbc5zU8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption of draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:18:04 -0000

Substantively: good start and therefore I support adoption of this draft.

Typo: s/sine/since

Sean

> On Jul 14, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com> wrote:
> 
> The recently approved LAMPS WG Charter adds this work item:
> 
>  
> 
> 5. Specify the use of hash-based signatures with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS).  Hash-based signature use small private and public keys, and they have low computational cost; however, the signature values are quite large.  For this reason they might not be used for signing X.509 certificates or S/MIME messages; however, sine hash-based signature algorithms are secure even if a large-scale quantum computer is invented.  The low computational cost for signature verification makes hash-based signatures attractive in the Internet of Things environments, and the quantum resistance makes them attractive for the distribution of software updates.
> 
>  
> 
> It has been suggested that the WG adopt draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig as the starting point for this work.  Since Russ Housley is the author of this draft, Tim Hollebeek will judge consensus for this discussion.  Please voice your support or concerns on the list.
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm