Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS Recharter Text

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 07 August 2017 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE90131D31 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.991
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.991 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pG80MgdRrbZE for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 480A513202B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v77L1isg031398; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 22:05:02 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=+PlcrapGT5EyWHkDhtVbg84uArd+ujYTABAkTUGUnfQ=; b=Cd+PvALUrBLVcYKPO679jky6LcxBYu3iSOyasmhTNLwmQhWqMOSROmBIwGKPYi539yUT deAHKhOF96iT1PfZu5F3VPv/TmIEeNXBB7/ZcjR1dPADo/o5n6mfk0w8Uz1Nzpr3rIA5 UZ0HVItL20a4dev/GNk/5S+9XRPBQ58QgkntQj6d76KoMM2NT3bailKd3DG0mROoDwAN yb+U7bGRMU9WhheBd+8IgJIHJldmlhHo1YPUxi03Rgfc+7fsdUyosqRkc+wo99qb+T9y voXRX4B/KjGTtH7s5UfKej+NfnmZwcwrGdX2EeWTbgi+hB7ce7W5axSVfE2VP7e47pfp uw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2c533bwrqt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Aug 2017 22:05:02 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v77L0ORQ008742; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 17:05:01 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2c59burc8w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Aug 2017 17:05:01 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 17:05:00 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 17:05:00 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
CC: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS Recharter Text
Thread-Index: AQHTDtREV2uTgAmGC0Ci5Fyipv6dEKJ47V2QgABWkYCAAGHaAP//vc/w
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 21:04:59 +0000
Message-ID: <4e0425e3edcb48b084a8d902c9f1f15a@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <3EC3EBBE-D17D-4A25-A61C-27872613FB4D@vigilsec.com> <bd6fd0ae17694954af359eafa0cff9bd@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <86bd7642-6c7b-8127-44dc-f268789dc039@seantek.com> <F8D920EC-F670-477A-97DA-2BBCF1038C60@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8D920EC-F670-477A-97DA-2BBCF1038C60@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-07_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708070347
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-07_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708070348
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/7CWz0ZmE0sCmcy5XUecIC_1usZc>
Subject: Re: [lamps] DRAFT LAMPS Recharter Text
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 21:05:06 -0000

> This does not have anything to do with the charter.

Hence the initial smiley.

> The previous AD felt that changing the name of the mail list was not important.  I do not know what the new AD thinks.

If we changed the name because of sensitivity issues then we should change the mailing list name because, in the IETF, WG's die but mailing lists never do.  And if there were other reasons, having the WG name and email name different is jarring.

Of course you know this :)