IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] IANA Considerations text for OID allocations

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sat, 01 October 2022 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975D9C152573 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 11:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0dLxEoqexvpN for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 11:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 300A2C14CE2F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 11:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (host-87-4-189-54.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.4.189.54]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E4E1F455; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id F11F51A0758; Sat, 1 Oct 2022 20:42:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <E6D49C54-028F-4E20-A1B2-632F6F10721C@vigilsec.com>
References: <12352.1657505901@localhost> <ada963a796ca3fafb42a29751020ff4326fd2a1e.camel@von-Oheimb.de> <563732.1659120308@dooku> <36c409c2-ab92-4ec2-6f1e-235652a243d9@siemens.com> <3758.1659557693@localhost> <399c3a1e-ee28-cc85-6e6a-cee210e70753@siemens.com> <DM6PR14MB2186188B8CFA66967F52A081929F9@DM6PR14MB2186.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <967934.1664572951@dooku> <81209437-81D3-4672-919E-D21C2BCE72D5@vigilsec.com> <317922.1664625988@dooku> <E6D49C54-028F-4E20-A1B2-632F6F10721C@vigilsec.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> message dated "Sat, 01 Oct 2022 13:45:55 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <402462.1664649753.1@dooku>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 20:42:33 +0200
Message-ID: <402463.1664649753@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/8YsjOFiUM_WaSf_KhkB05ZHMKJ4>
Subject: Re: [lamps] IANA Considerations text for OID allocations
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 18:42:40 -0000

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    >> I *think* that the paragraph above gets inserted by IANA, and not by the authors.

    > I believe that bulk of the text gets inserted by the authors, and then
    > the RFC Editor does a minimal edit to reflect the assignment that is
    > made by IANA.

I'll poke around, but if that's the case, then we should ask IANA to make
sure authors write more ligibly :-)

    > You can confirm this by looking at the last I-D and comparing it to the RFC.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email