Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

These I-Ds are the one I know about so far ...

   draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-encryption-00.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-keys-00.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-sigs-05.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-explicit-composite-keys-00.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-external-pubkeys-00.txt

Russ

> On Aug 1, 2021, at 4:04 PM, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> We did not include PQC on the agenda for IETF 111 because we wanted to
>> dedicate a whole virtual interim to the topic.  This pool is to find a
>> time in the first two weeks of September.  Please provide your
>> availabily promptly so we can get the meeting scheduled.
> 
>> https://doodle.com/poll/3m8ca2yyfvttb78w
> 
> Thanks for this.  I think that this makes a lot of sense.
> Are there documents we should read for this?
> (I don't see anything on the DT attached to lamps, but I'm sure that we had
> some proposals being discussed)
> 
> Can you add them as additional documents at:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/documents/manage/
> (guessed URL)
> 
> I was going to ask if we could use the second most popular time for the
> needed CSRATTRs discussion, but then it occurs to me that the list of
> interested parties is probably different.
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>