Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 01 August 2021 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ECD3A11E5 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mT_c5XF8VsIX for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B344B3A1220 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 14:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EF1300C1B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:27:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id vYTOdg-GqM4r for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA072300AEC; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <18295.1627848278@localhost>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:27:14 -0400
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B87BFD0F-EEDC-4DDA-B22F-FF92714B6171@vigilsec.com>
References: <CBE95F06-7678-4D63-B39E-D66DDFC2906D@vigilsec.com> <18295.1627848278@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9hZE3H7kB3wg84gEdryhh_-Co38>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 21:27:22 -0000

These I-Ds are the one I know about so far ...

   draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-encryption-00.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-keys-00.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-sigs-05.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-explicit-composite-keys-00.txt
   draft-ounsworth-pq-external-pubkeys-00.txt

Russ

> On Aug 1, 2021, at 4:04 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> We did not include PQC on the agenda for IETF 111 because we wanted to
>> dedicate a whole virtual interim to the topic.  This pool is to find a
>> time in the first two weeks of September.  Please provide your
>> availabily promptly so we can get the meeting scheduled.
> 
>> https://doodle.com/poll/3m8ca2yyfvttb78w
> 
> Thanks for this.  I think that this makes a lot of sense.
> Are there documents we should read for this?
> (I don't see anything on the DT attached to lamps, but I'm sure that we had
> some proposals being discussed)
> 
> Can you add them as additional documents at:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/documents/manage/
> (guessed URL)
> 
> I was going to ask if we could use the second most popular time for the
> needed CSRATTRs discussion, but then it occurs to me that the list of
> interested parties is probably different.
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>