[lamps] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: (with COMMENT)

Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 17 September 2019 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5063812011A; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig@ietf.org, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com, spasm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.101.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <156875809431.17488.13686721328758793354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:08:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9vHDCbqwFuO6Ah_1dtvfrbUSrs8>
Subject: [lamps] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:08:15 -0000

Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi

thank you for this document.

   There have been recent advances in cryptanalysis and advances in the
   development of quantum computers.  Each of these advances pose a
   threat to widely deployed digital signature algorithms.

   Recent advances in cryptoanalysis [BH2013] and progress in the
   development of quantum computers [NAS2019] pose a threat to widely
   deployed digital signature algorithms.

looks redundant.

-m