[lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-05

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Tue, 23 April 2019 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F37120025 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTs5U9z6JBXT for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B2E120429 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x3NE7189002643 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:07:01 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x3NE7189002643
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1556028421; bh=lrmU0TvIHufGbukKikRuMxD8G60oVrHl/m70L39HzYk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=PvEPZjKw6qD5xEMO5unMWDnuPW05fUsBJh5GHY6w3lXb1u8ca1eO3QY+z0lqhYcb5 KfZNkh3m3If1+XxMsaYvXXdGCL1w7dIzdLSuNHCWWZlImuyCDaw3Yub3O9JWSIL7W6 U0QcGtgKcoxq+kHxU571XLlriZlY8khY8IOnbdXI=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x3NE6vOZ002678 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:06:57 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:06:57 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-05
Thread-Index: AdT52+VMDH5rT9ScQOaTFmdrDJCp9AAAdRhg
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:06:56 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B3343EEA@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9vbRF0bq3I_5qvTOzN-q1vvoygc>
Subject: [lamps] AD Review: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-05
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:07:08 -0000

Hello!

I reviewed draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-05.  This draft is ready to progress.  The easy diff from rfc6844 was greatly appreciated.

A few nits:

(1) Section 3.  Nit.  s/in RFC 1034/in [RFC1034]/

(2) Section 4.1.1.  Nit.  s/the the/the/

Thanks,
Roman