IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-01

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3896D3A065A for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9LJNGA72XoP for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 036253A078F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 15:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799FE300B3F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 18:46:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AZ8uXNE3IDhl for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 18:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40948300A01 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 18:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:46:22 -0400
References: <31FF8CDA-9A6B-4C16-ABD0-800E06325748@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <31FF8CDA-9A6B-4C16-ABD0-800E06325748@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <89A15B08-A362-4240-B2E7-677343AF5AFB@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/AqpEIsgApB6yttRoW3qw8xcTp4A>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-01
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:46:32 -0000

A few things need to be changed based on the detailed review that I did for the shepherd writeup.

1) The upper left of the title page needed to include "Updates: 6960 (if approved)"

2) I do not think that reference [1] is needed.  I do not find it harmful, but IDnits thinks it is a normative reference, and of course, it is not.

3) The IANA Considerations should say: "This document does not call for any IANA actions."

Russ

> On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> This is the LAMPS WG Last Call for "OCSP Nonce Extension” <draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-01>.  Please review the document and send your comments to the list by 12 May 2020.
> 
> The datatracker page for the document is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce/
> 
> Thanks,
> Russ & Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email