[lamps] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-20: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 02 June 2022 11:48 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates@ietf.org, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, housley@vigilsec.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <165417052608.7970.15976841129387411881@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 04:48:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Au7BnZFKrUswu6FjJWdQzH3MD3U>
Subject: [lamps] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-20: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-20: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Paul's discuss.

Hopefully, given all the hard work that has been done, it shouldn't be too hard
to respin -bis versions of the RFCs instead of publishing this document.

Regards,
Rob

[lamps] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-iet… Robert Wilton via Datatracker