IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 25 June 2019 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C971F1207C0; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=xGAWwBPF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=lPF5Vl/J
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xeyO4UNIel6Q; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F64B120135; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F72F22398; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:27:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:27:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=7 SqyTIVkQiRYK8nHDSf7W+ugSTPQyn3kcVIjTMCJQEc=; b=xGAWwBPFgF/YbPk4N IhESROeKsT+73dOwvPkwO1iZHxtGCbbED60q2BC2Urnlmw3fExmr4Bcp9fL/1i44 PxetvBXTODraTVqfXehpCsK9JdhqxWohbiLIz4tNln/AjyEcT8v4vnwAqnu3DB2U m9LPLC6urevkPZyd18cgZ1AwWzEGpfrQHe1Bp2WIyLKm+NASjFc0wOHXmldsGV6g /DjyLVt/vHbTEn6oHKDfslHq7fGJW7OS2+XmFJfOqfr1KqnVrHjmeZzFp5lwdr12 x5sBJDSKwqIAoEjKwQahkygPD4q6GfloSb21//zMlQ4lJerCDpyIkeQnFMhKdglQ 3kWvw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=7SqyTIVkQiRYK8nHDSf7W+ugSTPQyn3kcVIjTMCJQ Ec=; b=lPF5Vl/JSd/xj9oiRelqoUwpKrF0iChjtCwL0k6QnUhjAq10sIIoGKiP9 pUB9yjHHDwGAGLIdKhujuOowr5Oe8Ne6GtOkF+iiVsqbyNDdljaGR+4hiBrR9EaX TDCGzQo86h8ApXWo49tZGxNL8jVRwGE7bJ+Y98G7wSZ2ZFceZ13HIozFiOcyaNMG +uSlQ12+TBIvthBSfERv+Vm+C9LUXEYS5reqFHurpYUo9y4I+e8AlSlxg5AgW6eb clO1Klo/D/hlDCIDze101Qab7NZ7EO3egNlgpCQT4ZpYvZ1oLAsZ5ghoLRHg53Hy h9s3hnAloQ8FV4WXivqpKgLE0cM8A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:d0sSXQAUKRhfGvKcWB65jCvYRgUsKhrSYPqzwvrvqhhj00PxNcQpjw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudeggdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddtkedrhedurddutddurdelkeenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:eEsSXXyNdLAfkg48n0af_ZEkgd6vDyUqsEBHBzwo2JiXWXzCQXUU_Q> <xmx:eEsSXVRFoaduF-H2TEZCqeiE92_18IFun_zldY8SrR833oaQ0HQqZQ> <xmx:eEsSXe_yrDlrUpKi6fa3S6v-uw6IPAY5Y0ALFP1xrs_gPPHLSuoEiA> <xmx:eEsSXcMpEyC-MJNTjat1761p1-a9N10B6kfvtXoWgpFMgLk1ySlyBw>
Received: from alcoop-m-c46z.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-101-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.101.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B2E4E380083; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <e69cf276-8b93-3210-8eb3-a93fe68b6c9d@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:27:34 -0400
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, spasm@ietf.org, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7916915C-76F6-4884-A0D4-FFAA2ABEEA21@cooperw.in>
References: <155393972295.3950.3582710869606616692@ietfa.amsl.com> <B3508ACC-5F76-4205-B380-FC4D35A4496E@vigilsec.com> <e69cf276-8b93-3210-8eb3-a93fe68b6c9d@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/CPE2jdzR6TgkSJDtfkRTc2cnz-g>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:27:43 -0000

Joel, thanks for your reviews. I entered a No Objection ballot. I trust that the identifier assignments will work out with NIST.

Alissa

> On Mar 31, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> Maybe a note that the assignment will take place once the drafts are approved, and that the RFC should coordiante with the authors and NIST on this?  (I presume we have done this before, and we do not have the problem we have in some other cases of "no number until RFC" / "no RFC until number".)
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 3/31/19 1:21 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:55 AM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>> Review result: Almost Ready
>>> 
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>>> like any other last call comments.
>>> 
>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>> 
>>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>> 
>>> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-08
>>> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
>>> Review Date: 2019-03-30
>>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-04-10
>>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>> 
>>> Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
>>> 
>>> Major issues:
>>>    One of the key points of this RFC seems to be to assign the identifiers for
>>>    the use of the two SHAKE variants.  It is thus confusing that the
>>>    identifiers end with "TBD", and thus are not defined in this document.
>> They will be assigned by NIST once they are sure that these are the identifiers that we want.  This is much the same as we do when IANA is ti assign the identifier.
>> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email