From nobody Thu Jan 13 09:21:36 2022
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAAC3A1810
 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:21:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id F0q4LadaL4-3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B7B3A1811
 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1304EC461D;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:21:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home
 (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDA16C44BD;
 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:21:20 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN2P110MB1107DC6E3D6DEC470D6AF651DC539@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:21:20 -0500
Cc: "Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>,
 LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>,
 "david.von.oheimb@siemens.com" <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>,
 John Gray <John.Gray@entrust.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6C1CF309-D2EE-41FD-9EBC-0CB548E13930@vigilsec.com>
References: <AM0PR10MB24180E40A20D83DB1BB5BDA6FE929@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <0E478455-1218-4D54-A256-44B9E318D251@vigilsec.com>
 <AM0PR10MB24184BFD4F8F2917D2B6C1C9FE989@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
 <BN2P110MB1107DC6E3D6DEC470D6AF651DC539@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/CSPYjVwxnDv-r-_N5lFUB3KVMwU>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Allocation of OIDs for CRL update retrieval
 (draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-13)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime
 \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>,
 <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>,
 <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:21:35 -0000

Roman:

I think we can get the OIDs as the document goes through the approval =
process.

Russ

> On Jan 13, 2022, at 11:25 AM, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hi!
>=20
> With apologies, I missed this request and took no action on requesting =
early allocation.  I see that draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-17 moved to =
the "Publication Requested" state yesterday.  Does the WG want me to =
pick-up this early allocation request or is it acceptable to wait until =
the document move through the normal process?
>=20
> If the WG wants early allocation to move as fast as possible, could I =
please get a pointer to demonstrate WG consensus on this allocation per =
Step #3 of Section 3.1 of RFC 7120.  I wasn't able to find that =
consensus in the IETF 112 meeting minutes that I believe are the =
reference noted below as "As discussed on Monday, ..."
>=20
> Roman
>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brockhaus, Hendrik <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>
>> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 10:32 AM
>> To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>; Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
>> Cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>; david.von.oheimb@siemens.com; John =
Gray
>> <John.Gray@entrust.com>
>> Subject: AW: Allocation of OIDs for CRL update retrieval =
(draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-
>> updates-13)
>>=20
>> Russ
>>=20
>> Thank you for starting the registration.
>> As soon as the OIDs are assigned, I will add them to the document.
>>=20
>> Hendrik
>>=20
>>> Von: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. November 2021 22:26
>>>=20
>>> Roman:
>>>=20
>>> As discussed on Monday, the LAMPS WG would like to get early
>>> (permanent) allocation of two OIDs from IANA.
>>>=20
>>> The relevant part of draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-13 is quoted =
below.
>>>=20
>>> The OID need to be allocated in SMI Security for PKIX CMP =
Information
>>> Types (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.4).
>>> =
(https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>>> iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fsmi-numbers%2Fsmi-numbers.xml%23smi-
>>> numbers-
>>>=20
>> 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.4&amp;data=3D04%7C01%7Chendrik.brockhaus%40siemens.com%
>>>=20
>> 7Ce429a066d36b4f2cf3da08d9a490ab14%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e149
>>>=20
>> 5d55a%7C1%7C0%7C637721763514579270%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8
>>>=20
>> eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
>>>=20
>> %7C1000&amp;sdata=3D9g3dUqOyT2qDNXWCBgw%2B7szmus2EI4jLWp0HTGC0
>>> zIM%3D&amp;reserved=3D0)
>>>=20
>>> Thanks,
>>>  Russ
>>>=20
>>> =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D
>>> 2.16.  New Section 5.3.19.17 - CRL update retrieval
>>>=20
>>>   The following subsection introduces the PKI general message using =
id-
>>>   it-crlStatusList and id-it-crls.  Details are specified in the
>>>   Lightweight CMP Profile Section 4.3
>>>   [I-D.ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile].  Insert this section =
after
>>>   new Section 5.3.19.16:
>>>=20
>>>   5.3.19.17.  CRL update retrieval
>>>=20
>>>   This MAY be used by the client to get new CRLs, specifying the =
source
>>>   of the CRLs and the thisUpdate value of the latest CRL it already
>>>   has, if available.  A CRL source is given either by a
>>>   DistributionPointName or the GeneralNames of the issuing CA.  The
>>>   server shall provide only those CRLs that are more recent than the
>>>   ones indicated by the client.
>>>=20
>>>      GenMsg:    {id-it TBD1}, SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF CRLStatus
>>>      GenRep:    {id-it TBD2}, SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF
>>>                               CertificateList  |  < absent >
>>>=20
>>>      CRLSource ::=3D CHOICE {
>>>         dpn          [0] DistributionPointName,
>>>         issuer       [1] GeneralNames }
>>>=20
>>>      CRLStatus ::=3D SEQUENCE {
>>>         source       CRLSource,
>>>         thisUpdate   Time OPTIONAL }
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

