Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 17 September 2017 16:17 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912E3133079 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 09:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3gsk5WUJbzIq for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 09:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CB26133073 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 09:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950E930057F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:17:03 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NYLCPa31f2RC for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:16:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.186] (vpn.snozzages.com [204.42.252.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1F22300277; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:16:57 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <BB336464-9936-450E-9463-0B18F588BAC4@akamai.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:16:56 -0400
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <80086CAE-8B03-4E3B-8715-07DDD1B00A0D@vigilsec.com>
References: <D774A9B1-F765-4BDA-9D78-D584B4B0EFF8@vigilsec.com> <BB336464-9936-450E-9463-0B18F588BAC4@akamai.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Clr6SK0JCHnjDEuDrq5mPZNlzAQ>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:17:08 -0000
> That looks fine to me. Where you asking the WG for input or something? We have two documents on CAA: - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5065 - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification-01.txt How does the mail list want to proceed? My note got one person to raise their hand to work on the SHAKE document. Once that is posted as an individual draft, we can see if the mail list wants to adopt it. Russ
- [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Salz, Rich
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Dr. Pala
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Salz, Rich
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Dang, Quynh (Fed)
- Re: [lamps] Starting work to CAA and SHAKE Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- [lamps] CMS with SHAKE128 and SHAKE256 draft. Dang, Quynh (Fed)