IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] On the need for standardization of software-based interoperable private keys [was: Re: draft-ietf-lamps-samples: PKCS12 expertise needed (including objects for comparison)]

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Thu, 05 August 2021 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926B33A07E6 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U3A-tJ3S2944 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1EC03A07E0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68541389AA; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AI3FLuPmFvjl; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:38:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EFC3898D; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:38:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF94963; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:34:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <e4893a327aa98b19aa8131ec6922187aee7fa858.camel@infradead.org>
References: <87czr0ww0d.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <FF939B28-528B-47F9-9C0C-6585D1B02FBE@vigilsec.com> <87mtq3ukk0.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <CAErg=HHQMZ1jk+bVxA=MzVvW+9ucie7bu-N6O8Asnp0V8Rf9Bg@mail.gmail.com> <30546.1627850836@localhost> <CAErg=HHKL-E5yT0UnPKcLfMQU41iDg7GGgjsSXs3eRg8daJRkg@mail.gmail.com> <87wnp347iu.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <1388.1627996026@localhost> <87pmuu42hf.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <20862.1628113377@localhost> <656985A5-BED4-4BA8-9233-B3C93966016C@ll.mit.edu> <877dh03x35.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <e4893a327aa98b19aa8131ec6922187aee7fa858.camel@infradead.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <17969.1628195662.1@localhost>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:34:22 -0400
Message-ID: <17970.1628195662@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/CmAKTbW2AeYHItQNk16hmLsv998>
Subject: Re: [lamps] On the need for standardization of software-based interoperable private keys [was: Re: draft-ietf-lamps-samples: PKCS12 expertise needed (including objects for comparison)]
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 20:34:33 -0000

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
    > I kind of baulk at the idea of adding yet *another* standard to that
    > list. I think I do prefer the idea of encouraging applications to

Yeah, so really we need to be removing things from the list, and
where there are issues (like passphrase for PKCS8), then we need to
clarify.

BTW: I think that this all fits into LAMPS.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email