IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-02-00: (with COMMENT)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 23 May 2018 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C32C1277BB; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bxu6DjWsDztm; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 104A7127010; Wed, 23 May 2018 12:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4NJdEKJ011749; Wed, 23 May 2018 20:40:35 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=c1lhUFDuxHRX8GkggShXAt7H9m4FCD8IuGOnRIzM6j0=; b=H/+ivu17RnRDJPOUadFRg53uxH7EUBW+K9DQM+NaPd6AiKqWV9DPrjmq/L5JG8G3hEHk I2DDCPYEjweR5AJe/JNCqHk38cfIe3FOw3jlw/A81ykoQv/ehavBMf+DRUCvR+Opt1hO +pr0U3cT6taPiLU7VYkhBBlMjVNlk59odT1sjQm4pK8QlAgrh/ALleS9Mw3bgh29TaAh S0z6DLXrg+9gG/d6SMd8lR+wGjwEuNzdKlKTWezaPON+PmYLcBVB4qAw/wyi4FZbgAwK RHhOGPQmpjJN7331Nu7ELArmGu7KJNSQLguAY5m/2K/EycpvYE5XITdiFUitmqdFfL58 Kg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a96-6-114-86.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j5e91g2c0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 May 2018 20:40:35 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w4NJVtqe016113; Wed, 23 May 2018 15:40:35 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.27.25]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2j2f8wb1yy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 May 2018 15:40:35 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 23 May 2018 14:40:34 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 23 May 2018 14:40:34 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>, "lamps-chairs@ietf.org" <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-02-00: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHT8sHQeu/yCKfdfEmAmiT4c7N2fKQ+CNUA//++PwA=
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 19:40:34 +0000
Message-ID: <32DD6ED8-F2C9-4193-98FA-BC7876634318@akamai.com>
References: <152709922899.26838.11074435093932176947.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <41e7a726-0175-7e3d-d35c-d413bf01ea12@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <41e7a726-0175-7e3d-d35c-d413bf01ea12@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.d.0.180513
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.34.137]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <20E984FD2C2954409FB28D09AAB0444E@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-23_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=544 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805230191
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-23_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=465 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805230192
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/DT4GcpmPSwQUJ-fv5wsjHuqotUM>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-02-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 19:40:40 -0000

>    My understanding is that the intention is "near-term from now." The idea 
    is that LAMPS should develop something that you could use, say, next 
    year to encrypt email you send so that, 15 years from now when someone 
    finally builds a 4,000 qubit machine, they can't dig out your (then) 
    14-year-old email and decrypt it.
  
Kenny Paterson gave a talk at a recent IETF where he said, basically, that the IETF should wait until NIST is done with their post-quantum evaluation/competition.  Are we sure we want to disagree with him?  Or is it just because digest-based signatures are well-understood that we're willing to do so.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email