Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 07 April 2021 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32C53A1ADD for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id evOBv0nI2jWi for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CC23A1ADA for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1617806002; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=RMsuF3omqHm7O8wupynHzIoj/So681b+WZSG85/Qwb8=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=WiG+xCckCuoo2e/zQdAaw+6JOI/MelmbYSlJ+yPrkpxnjMHKAZAtQy+GCwk7vb6sjTAHtP tImLQKwY+3RLJiBCIY//9c12OParfRiYMlFarOQm/HHzsCnp6d3BHBo+nu/aoBFMgdJcwN 53AuElPhmLUpuycPsTw9aAszaEuMuWs=;
Received: from [192.168.1.222] (host5-81-100-35.range5-81.btcentralplus.com [5.81.100.35]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <YG3CsQA0hHzc@waldorf.isode.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:33:22 +0100
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <FF9C1FC4-78AF-4AC2-AD8D-973FB9270C84@vigilsec.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <498010c5-4c47-b45d-7a01-1c7c45f58307@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:33:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
In-Reply-To: <FF9C1FC4-78AF-4AC2-AD8D-973FB9270C84@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/DbYCLXlw2rTQT-zeH5u5-Uirtgw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 14:33:31 -0000

On 01/04/2021 21:36, Russ Housley wrote:

> A re-charter has been sent to the IESG that includes this new work item:
>
>> 4. Provide concrete guidance for implementers of email user agents
>> to promote interoperability of end-to-end cryptographic protection
>> of email messages.  This may include guidance about the generation,
>> interpretation, and handling of protected messages; management of the
>> relevant certificates; documentation of how to avoid common failure
>> modes; strategies for deployment in a mixed environment; as well as
>> test vectors and examples that can be used by implementers and
>> interoperability testing.  The resulting robust consensus among email
>> user agent implementers is expected to provide more usable and useful
>> cryptographic security for email users.
> Assuming that the IESG approves the re-charter text, should the LAMPS WG adopt draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance as the starting point for this work?
>
> Please voice your support or raise concerns by 14 April 2021.

Yes, I support adoption of this draft as a LAMPS WG document.