Re: [lamps] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-02

[Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the fixes, Rob. I've incorporated these into my working copy 
on GitHub.

Russ, can you provide feedback on the next steps, process-wise? Should I 
go ahead and upload a -03 draft?

On 11/5/18 8:42 AM, Rob Stradling wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 00:46, Russ Housley wrote:
>> Russ Housley has requested publication of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-02 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the LAMPS working group.
>>
>> Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis/
> Sorry, I realize it's rather late in the day for these comments, so
> please consider or ignore/reject them as you see fit:
>
> 1. "Comodo Group, Inc" was never my employer.  My real employer, "Comodo
> CA Limited", just changed its name to "Sectigo Limited".
> https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/pull/2
>
> 2. Typo: amount -> among.
> https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/pull/3
>
> 3. Section 4 says:
>     "The search for a CAA record climbs the DNS name tree from the
>      specified label up to but not including the DNS root '.' until CAA
>      records are found.
> What if a CAA lookup returns just a single record (that contains, for
> example, an "issue" property)?  That wouldn't be a plurality of "CAA
> records", and so (by that wording) ISTM that the tree climbing must
> continue.  I think "...until a CAA Resource Record set is found" would
> be a better description of what's intended.
> Related to this, ISTM that "The search for a CAA record..." should be
> "The search for a CAA Resource Record set...", since CAs must always
> consider the full RRset.  For example, CAs should not consider an
> "issue" property whilst ignoring an "issuewild" property in the same RRset.
> https://github.com/jsha/caa-simplification/pull/4
>