Re: [lamps] ASN.1 module in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 18 January 2019 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AE71311F1 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:59:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RWQoaP6ewFty for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8074C1311ED for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96034300A31 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:41:21 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id fH-H4H-MFF34 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:41:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-108-45-137-105.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.137.105]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75511300400; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:41:20 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <05ae01d4aeda$15cf07a0$416d16e0$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:59:36 -0500
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <794C2DA0-AD75-4788-87C3-3DCFBB946965@vigilsec.com>
References: <05ae01d4aeda$15cf07a0$416d16e0$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/E3mOMC0nELGHiloi2wwnnXtpu8Q>
Subject: Re: [lamps] ASN.1 module in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:59:43 -0000
Jim: To keep it simple in the final stages of publication, I suggest that the ASN.1 module stay as it is, but add an additional Note at the from of Appendix A: Note: An equivalent ASN.1 module that uses the 2002 version of ASN.1 is available in [RFC5911]. Russ > On Jan 17, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > > I don't remember that I ever raised the issue while dealing with updates to > this document, however one question is should we have updated the ASN.1 > module from the current 1988 module to one which is derived from RFC 5911 > which is using current ASN.1. > > We are currently in AUTH48 so this is the last chance to update this is > desired. > > Jim
- [lamps] ASN.1 module in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-… Jim Schaad
- Re: [lamps] ASN.1 module in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5… Russ Housley