[lamps] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-20: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 01 June 2022 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3DCC157B55; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 03:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates@ietf.org, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, housley@vigilsec.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.3.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <165408090443.61521.1723083927966397576@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 03:55:04 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/EEjb0LACf4YxqTIwAJ2RH8cdD_k>
Subject: [lamps] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-20: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 10:55:04 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-20: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

While I am balloting ABSTAIN, I fully support Paul Wouters' blocking DISCUSS.

The content of the I-D is probably valuable and critical but the current format
of the publication is not. IMHO and to be honest, the only valid option is "Do
not publish" as a RFC but keep it as a working item in the WG...

Again, nothing against the WG or the authors (thanks for their work) but the
current format is not edible. Thanks for their hard work.

Regards

-éric