Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7269)
Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Tue, 13 December 2022 22:47 UTC
Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A59AC14CE2E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:47:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6G8wQ16KDpv for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:47:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97C2C14CE2C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:47:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4A04243E42; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:47:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0bSkfxgcNNTl; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:47:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F9564243EC3; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:47:33 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221213124844.696B4AFB54@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:47:32 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DF399FF5-5DE7-4BD6-9A50-EC03BB8C9BF2@amsl.com>
References: <20221213124844.696B4AFB54@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/EnuGdbcNcet4ebFvUhl9NGeWflg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7269)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 22:47:37 -0000
Greetings, FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Dec 13, 2022, at 4:48 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649, > "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7269 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: David Mitscherling <davidmitscherling596@gmail.com> > > Section: 211911 > > Original Text > ------------- > Redaktionell > > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > wobei „Technisch“ ein Fehler im technischen Inhalt ist (dazu gehören Änderungen an der Verwendung von RFC 2119-Schlüsselwörtern. > ) und „ Redaktionell “ ein Rechtschreib-, Grammatik-, Interpunktions- oder Syntaxfehler ist, der die technische Bedeutung nicht beeinflusst. > > Notes > ----- > 2119 > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension > Publication Date : August 2019 > Author(s) : R. Housley > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7269) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Chris Smiley