[lamps] AD Review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 05 March 2021 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFD93A0B20 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:53:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fanP7dV8ZQnr for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE6853A0B17 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 125JrWit046902 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:53:32 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu 125JrWit046902
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1614974012; bh=1yHwjbpgdDCIvPxEpR3WiG5q7COnhZEeixN+uakaxdw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=QUyCE3tq7FRn1iVXInpIR47B6rOX8lVH2IlNxmymXYmMu6t3emetBmAuNd3TgoZro xyijl7aEjqhzbHBWz/5u+IBdoSDZ8XETVyKhHBo7WiM4sYe/6lSNuEu7klKGUOWg94 20V18trBitWpXN1kmYvoqPthz1bd7L50NKmzSf9M=
Received: from MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (muriel.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.47]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 125JrWhI008344 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:53:32 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:53:32 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:53:32 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04
Thread-Index: AdcR+PA9GNtcvDmMRBC/KijPacBw7w==
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 19:53:31 +0000
Message-ID: <029add1dad4b477cb34755d0e007d825@cert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.203.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/FEHP0Jeig1m09bNQ8_uZhz4ruMg>
Subject: [lamps] AD Review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 19:53:36 -0000

Hi!

I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04.  I don't have any additional feedback that hasn't been previously shared so I'm advancing it to IETF LC.

Thanks,
Roman