Re: [lamps] struggling with CSRAttrs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 30 September 2022 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E31C1522A7 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fd8Tt_OW-8Ba for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE65C1522C8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (host-87-4-189-54.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.4.189.54]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709761F455; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:32:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id B59281A0753; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:32:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: David von Oheimb <David.von.Oheimb@siemens.com>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <56a8af3a-63f2-5f19-62d9-59469ab678bf@siemens.com>
References: <12352.1657505901@localhost> <ada963a796ca3fafb42a29751020ff4326fd2a1e.camel@von-Oheimb.de> <563732.1659120308@dooku> <36c409c2-ab92-4ec2-6f1e-235652a243d9@siemens.com> <56a8af3a-63f2-5f19-62d9-59469ab678bf@siemens.com>
Comments: In-reply-to David von Oheimb <David.von.Oheimb@siemens.com> message dated "Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:45:04 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:32:19 +0200
Message-ID: <810723.1664555539@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/FMNYIc46-R2cTAZSYTXfeE3zMjM>
Subject: Re: [lamps] struggling with CSRAttrs
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:32:27 -0000

David von Oheimb <David.von.Oheimb@siemens.com> wrote:
    > I believe we should clarify that

    >  * There MUST be /at most one/ attribute describing X.509 extensions,
    > i.e., one bearing the OID extensionRequest (1.2.840.113549.1.9.14) as
    > its type.

    > * The set in such an X.509 extension value MUST contain
    > exactly one element.

    > * The value of such an attribute MUST be of type
    > Extensions, i.e., a sequence of Extension.

I've opened issue:
https://github.com/mcr/lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/issues/7

to track this.  I'm not really sure where to put this text yet.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-