IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Re: [EXTERNAL] Responding to ISSUE #5

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 15 August 2024 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F428C15107A for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSoTqbfQsOn3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5EEDC169416 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1732B3898D; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:18:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id 8NX-VyrtwTnx; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:18:48 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1723684728; bh=jb5cRhASAuxg6QHGz2f3jPcz0OaUnu4QB/8NHMgPwi8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Aw/spJCJUcMaeqiRXrR4vXjLtnMgHs3/NinL5qYV5/W4vwWBfgN/K9MVMVhrF4H6g 3drs1CdUbODmi0ZJM+2auEGMEJQ+TFxRmgw7tbu0tvbQOzW+OY3Oz6Q1ANEOEgyF2D eL4XA/bgcaVwkLRdMe1VrW66CEaJ6+N0wkA0z0kieGEWoHOKcJMYUUvlQ2L3Nev1Eo jTn5KJVcU+MHybGXSh0wtu/2D3HnhS7JtJZb6QWQdb4Q19fJ+YnnzWNRe4GgJZ7bti 0Pjoj1BJii8BQg9p7UjP0TPJVkiFbRqbYPAd0D+q4/L72RQu8leTtuPUp+fw+ywpV/ pCK2BPj9pA+RQ==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002DE3898B; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3F7442; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: John Gray <John.Gray=40entrust.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB25859C4C54689E559E14C81EEA872@DM6PR11MB2585.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <01a801dae4ba$c5dfcf00$519f6d00$@enigma.com.pl> <CH0PR11MB57394FCDB757B76712CCB2599F872@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <SN7PR14MB649202EDCEABDEDFDA54A34183872@SN7PR14MB6492.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CH0PR11MB57394A4CD342E03CD37FD8D69F872@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <SN7PR14MB64924A20A9882A2A84B62F1583872@SN7PR14MB6492.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CH0PR11MB5739C09E6BE414917CE714A29F872@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR11MB25859C4C54689E559E14C81EEA872@DM6PR11MB2585.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:18:47 -0400
Message-ID: <3628.1723684727@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: VCK2HIAS4FFNWAGFBR2TMEEKSCYMKK25
X-Message-ID-Hash: VCK2HIAS4FFNWAGFBR2TMEEKSCYMKK25
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: [EXTERNAL] Responding to ISSUE #5
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/FVqyuEnXgxVu0M2h4oaIXBwdBhU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

John Gray <John.Gray=40entrust.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
     > I agree that it seems very obvious so why would these tables be needed.

(Don't underestimate idiots)

    > It kind of feels like all that information should be available
    > somewhere else, like maybe a PQUIP document?

> Perhaps the PQC for Engineers document,

It belongs here.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status