Re: [lamps] rfc7030-est clarifications of ASN.1

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Thu, 08 August 2019 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87549120094 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 20:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZFa6JKdEPsKz for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 20:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72601120033 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 20:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 20:22:51 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Michael Richardson' <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: 'LAMPS WG' <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <13908.1564606053@localhost> <BEF231F3-E6B3-4DB6-8C3A-1C98E413CC87@vigilsec.com> <32761.1564622701@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <32761.1564622701@localhost>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:22:48 -0700
Message-ID: <005b01d54d98$8fcd93c0$af68bb40$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKOYeaY1WZie7uRfI3wjvv1nDlyRgHXGrlUAe6BCe+lYEAnIA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GekNBFtkOgiUC5TjIOUKsi4NRVw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] rfc7030-est clarifications of ASN.1
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:23:38 -0000

Michael,

If you tried to learn it back that far, I don't think that it was even part
of the language at that point in time.  

Just a quick note on the module that Russ provided.  The import for the CMS
module is incorrect.  It should be:

     FROM CryptographicMessageSyntax-2010  -- [RFC6268]
       { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549)
         pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0)
          id-mod-cms-2009(58) }

jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 6:25 PM
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lamps] rfc7030-est clarifications of ASN.1


Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
    >> I think this is not real ASN.1 syntax, but rather an indication for
me
    >> to insert more stuff?  Or is this something real that I don't
    >> understand.

    > No, this is real ASN.1 syntax.

okay.
It's something I once tried to learn, back in 1995, and I got as far as the
trivial stuff, but that was all.

I will incorporate your module into the clarifications document.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -=
IPv6 IoT consulting =-