[lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7098)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 21 August 2022 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A3C1524B3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAkrR1L9wgCd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766B5C1522DE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4BF5E289E4; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, housley@vigilsec.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: 7ryn1431@gmail.com, spasm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220821055334.4BF5E289E4@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/HiFXXuQqsGXZmbqSPBasbGWwOgE>
Subject: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7098)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 05:53:39 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649,
"Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Terry ryan <7ryn1431@gmail.com>

Section: 4159751021

Original Text

Corrected Text
Not my IP address the person tracking my phone stealing my money got every account I have blocked

That IP number is tracking my phone stealing my money stopping my text ECT.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07)
Title               : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
Publication Date    : August 2019
Author(s)           : R. Housley
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG