[lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7098)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 21 August 2022 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A3C1524B3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAkrR1L9wgCd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766B5C1522DE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4BF5E289E4; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, housley@vigilsec.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: 7ryn1431@gmail.com, spasm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220821055334.4BF5E289E4@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 22:53:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/HiFXXuQqsGXZmbqSPBasbGWwOgE>
Subject: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7098)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 05:53:39 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649,
"Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7098

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Terry ryan <7ryn1431@gmail.com>

Section: 4159751021

Original Text
-------------
73e0e98bbfe43119

Corrected Text
--------------
Not my IP address the person tracking my phone stealing my money got every account I have blocked

Notes
-----
That IP number is tracking my phone stealing my money stopping my text ECT.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
Publication Date    : August 2019
Author(s)           : R. Housley
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG