[lamps] Header Protection Issues (Information only)
Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Wed, 30 September 2020 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAB43A0B52 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3hswe3zV9PgG for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c0c:15fc::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37AAE3A0B51 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1kNi8O-0009dL-0N for spasm@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:51:28 +0200
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:51:27 +0200
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: IETF LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2009302147320.1283@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/IY-Rl7-SACA9sBofVkwRUbswk9w>
Subject: [lamps] Header Protection Issues (Information only)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:51:32 -0000
Dear LAMPS list As agreed in LAMPS WG during IETF-108, am starting to send the issues around Header Protection to the list for further discussion (or confirmation that there are no objections). The issues will be somewhat distributed to avoid too many topics at the same time. cheers Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Modern Telephony Solutions and Tech Consulting for Internet Technology
- [lamps] Header Protection Issues (Information onl… Bernie Hoeneisen