[lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9216 (6993)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 15 June 2022 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF42C159481 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oO6B06pVJvOc for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683F8C157B5E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 2C00FCD7FB; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, dkg@fifthhorseman.net, spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220615204928.2C00FCD7FB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:49:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Jp4IEe2iiw2yfR3GZl0wBQZgF3U>
Subject: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9216 (6993)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 20:49:32 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9216, "S/MIME Example Keys and Certificates". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6993 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Section: 8 Original Text ------------- Email Address: dna@smime.example Corrected Text -------------- Email Address: dana@smime.example Notes ----- Decoding the certificate shoes that the Subject Alternative Name contains an email address of dana@smime.example. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9216 (draft-ietf-lamps-samples-08) -------------------------------------- Title : S/MIME Example Keys and Certificates Publication Date : April 2022 Author(s) : D. K. Gillmor, Ed. Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9216 (6993) RFC Errata System