[lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7315)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 21 January 2023 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA53BC1522C3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 10:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_OpUSqbmWC8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 10:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17100C14CEED for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 10:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id CF17055A2C; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 10:32:43 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: pedroesquivelguillen@gmail.com, housley@vigilsec.com, spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230121183243.CF17055A2C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 10:32:43 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/KJhcPSrVyNYQ5Ws9XEBgsDfYHUg>
Subject: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7315)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 18:32:47 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649, "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7315 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Zait Daniel <pedroesquivelguillen@gmail.com> Section: 4522277084 Original Text ------------- Pedroesquivelguillen@gmail.com Corrected Text -------------- Pedroesquivelguillen@gmail.com Notes ----- Pedroesquivelguillen@gmail.com Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension Publication Date : August 2019 Author(s) : R. Housley Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (7315) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Chris Smiley