Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 02 September 2021 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD4C3A093C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 12:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSlysNgHCoe8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 12:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3C13A093B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 12:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id q14so4777266wrp.3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=eZYLnYXiTnhD7Wx9xDB9duUBCgnzU0iDnwNV+sRRKn0=; b=kUrLpuZUl0E9YWI49OUMytpwsyQ3r+2dRsv2UKUQJyo89udtJcvbZNEJ7TV/xSHyAX cNx9wb7Ew8iBmCzHoA/1YnoOQ4QwCdHGF0/HxFZpBgTJxyfsKhdtNIkHgr4VXH9OKfGX KVuHNH6F8Yuz0HzMbaV9vreG0LLdF4VVJGLY2lPxoxEbf8M90+x3whfh10ybVMH7KSWI shEb2sTqrib7WklVeMEQ1PlMf8VNAfQ4f/oNodcpyHQmqLne/K+rgmqHEPbIcuoZ4jGn 9vsvGTrdk2wGWkElIVtME9t54ILKs+oHb4JSV/g+zmd8nHeJZ/xpJ/fLNIGsxP7UeI6T dAng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=eZYLnYXiTnhD7Wx9xDB9duUBCgnzU0iDnwNV+sRRKn0=; b=BYs9IspI/pFn/7OMfFFEIuSn/BKmJgiBjmDwxmppiKAfOsQCaOlWqCfM2akO9TSl7Z p+5wycLYbxFrOU4Cvmkwh4FlfAt2Mc1/4qjjHRrpt+6Vp5JGNEB4RR6OWYJcZuCl4E9B bmaSrZH9KHYRMD1vonQBuy2bPEaWxSKl27MCbD4yyBth64Yx3ggqv6Eo8Gca3CJiVW8a KDGEhxRx3DXEMcrecqDseDQP9FrLByTOjSkxGFeo/P4/ScFX2tc5TZYtNTyM3euXtftC I+vR+XAFJYdErdrmHNq5Fs5+cY1RE1RNjbsR0DgwY4sWX5QE0wqVoecKhHWnqOvTM9vh 015A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mumDq3nIqe0JrFsJYdQ8tmo1FtJOIWUb+5uruWL3SedwtZtHh 8oxiy01sxb/oQ6lgYVKgNoA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxu45YoEv0FQvEq3S+7SlAGpKJzKwDN3OetfHvi+BeE3opOAFR9XMOOSPg85cGWlKiGFbzZ/w==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6707:: with SMTP id o7mr5875045wru.307.1630612337130; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([46.120.57.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 129sm2451219wmz.26.2021.09.02.12.52.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3AFE036D-3EA9-4C56-A589-97A59289AAA3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E0CFF405-CC17-40F9-B685-75843A38CB14"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 22:52:14 +0300
In-Reply-To: <D99E74D7-08C5-4851-8B98-A1F3746C9B74@vigilsec.com>
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <CBE95F06-7678-4D63-B39E-D66DDFC2906D@vigilsec.com> <D99E74D7-08C5-4851-8B98-A1F3746C9B74@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/KViQSvIK3a6RrUVquuV4EQAtbZU>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 19:52:25 -0000

Hi.

Whatever happened with this? 

As far as I can tell, this was the last message on the list about a PQC focused interim. Nor was such a meeting mentioned the the CSRAttr interim that we did have.

Yoav

> On 14 Aug 2021, at 23:52, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> It looks like September 13th is preferred.  We will make the decision on Monday or Tuesday.  If you have not responded, please do so now.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
>> On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:04 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> We did not include PQC on the agenda for IETF 111 because we wanted to dedicate a whole virtual interim to the topic.  This pool is to find a time in the first two weeks of September.  Please provide your availabily promptly so we can get the meeting scheduled.
>> 
>> 	https://doodle.com/poll/3m8ca2yyfvttb78w
>> 
>> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>> Russ
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm