IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications

Daniel Van Geest <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB55120BDD for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VyNZVIevncbh for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esa1.isaracorp.com (esa1.isaracorp.com [207.107.152.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC6A4120BDB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
IronPort-SDR: kF+ttcmsRN7jzlQ+Yq6AMkFRDVLJuYqQkKkFAHl71b4dZgdnybL4bH1n+DVBLmJMnRNXdzN7z8 3p9p8f84n1n/GcP7Kuf5swqX1i0n9Xvf4hjFHL5ANq6XMR5cUwzK4v0bXg/w6C+10ib5cXvxgw Gv3TUqnJxHkPDWAbCEDiif13TLlLMm2gcUbZsVNxrGErBmr56b+rXJJUERcKFKU3h3+m7diyoy 9zMvlIC3RrkbybBiLnrYY6/ySzlmLAghRfFs8B3/PYdk6NPkzPrWhrPcdMTNoyZe0cWFxFi/cr c/8=
Received: from unknown (HELO V0501WEXGPR02.isaracorp.com) ([10.5.9.20]) by ip1.isaracorp.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2019 18:48:53 +0000
Received: from V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com (10.5.8.20) by V0501WEXGPR02.isaracorp.com (10.5.9.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1779.2; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:49:53 -0400
Received: from V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com ([fe80::d802:5aec:db34:beba]) by V0501WEXGPR01.isaracorp.com ([fe80::d802:5aec:db34:beba%7]) with mapi id 15.01.1779.002; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:49:53 -0400
From: Daniel Van Geest <Daniel.VanGeest@isara.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
Thread-Index: AQHVRHA9vepqQ/jtQ0yplc6ZP7NY6acnZUcAgAq1RYA=
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:49:52 +0000
Message-ID: <B36ACC93-B68D-4908-93BD-7FF1A19D378F@isara.com>
References: <3DB1B550-26FA-4F93-8CFA-434C1F8811D1@vigilsec.com> <F40D7FDE-207C-4CE0-8DFA-AAC1015CAA7A@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F40D7FDE-207C-4CE0-8DFA-AAC1015CAA7A@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.5.52]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B36ACC93B68D490893BD7FF1A19D378Fisaracom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Ljertyb__A7oIc05hu0WvJJ-uxo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed charter update regarding clarifications
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:48:56 -0000

I’m in favour of the new text.

On 2019-09-11, 3:18 PM, "Spasm on behalf of Russ Housley" <spasm-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spasm-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:

I am concerned that we have heard from very few people on this topic, with roughly equal numbers speaking for, against, and indifferent.  If you have not spoken, please do so.

Russ

On Jul 27, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
At the meeting in Montreal, we suggested a charter update to allow clarifications.  I suggest:
OLD:
In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents
produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WGs, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
any of these potential work items without rechartering.
NEW:
In addition, the LAMPS WG may investigate other updates to documents
produced by the PKIX and S/MIME WG. The LAMPS WG may produce
clarifications where needed, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
anything beyond clarifications without rechartering.
Thoughts?
Russ

_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@ietf.org<mailto:Spasm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email