Re: [lamps] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-06: (with COMMENT)

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Ben:
> 
>>> §1.4 (and subsequent change version): I infer from the section titles that the
>>> normative keywords in these sections are intended to describe
>>> requirements added to those versions, not new requirements in _this_
>>> version. It would be better to make that explicit; the body text should stand
>>> alone without the titles.
>> 
>> Yes that is what is intended to be said.  I agree and thus did not use keywords in section 1.6.
>> 
>> This is historic text copied from a previous version and as such I am slightly reluctant to change.
>> EKR and Russ - what do you think?
> 
> It’s not a big deal one way or another, but a simple note that says “Version X.Y added the following:” would help.

I do not understand your suggestion.  This document specifies Version 4.0, and these sections describe the evolution from version 3 (the first one that the IETF produced) to this version.

1.4.  Changes from S/MIME v3 to S/MIME v3.1
1.5.  Changes from S/MIME v3.1 to S/MIME v3.2
1.6.  Changes since S/MIME 3.2

Russ