[lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6662)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 20 August 2021 04:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7053A138C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id amrjwhNAaqzR for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B7A3A1388 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E9742F40741; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jacob@daxmachinery.net, housley@vigilsec.com, spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210820043252.E9742F40741@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:32:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/OYEB5Amid0V-T51Fza8TF7hWgGM>
Subject: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6662)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 04:33:05 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649, "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6662 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Jacob Herman <jacob@daxmachinery.net> Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- New domain Corrected Text -------------- daxmachinery.net Notes ----- New domain name. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension Publication Date : August 2019 Author(s) : R. Housley Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6662) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8649 (… Chris Smiley