Re: [lamps] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (5418)

Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D91130F72 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DlcwVYclbfj0 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A94130F81 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q9-v6so7679779ioj.8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sUTPlcGcuxEI9IN5qtMkCFU4TyXOotSBZWSSFxz8Cs0=; b=MLvfDOFwk7xTJKlg3XYJal6CvUpGS08xuVH9ViwX/WGNQC8KyDgxddUfz3GKtGXpjH 4PfS0xMuOLtPJ60zuf1wsJJ7FrZB5i3ODLDCcZn5AiIaNwlPTLJWhmhM6I5FvdLH7GxO UYuiCyAeYA9OAXvAKLyIKkvyP55q9AS55uQAyGH7RqyS3R3UOzNrhkKXlW9cKWLW5+EM t8Oq6eDBfAflmvzwBnjFZ/lEvjLxcWe8EuGCmBq4w/2kfZHThoMetebDo+zvEqHHzEVz zPM8n0AJ1JwrZGYv+c9JwZ7h/onXxnY9Is2pMNTHyUiW1nwsTzWqk9YihJ8f2kACJzu1 X+JQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sUTPlcGcuxEI9IN5qtMkCFU4TyXOotSBZWSSFxz8Cs0=; b=lYzDoofE+wV9MK9ms4SKCEXzX0up+Ikf/PBeEnVBFzHWBdbmm281acEkyK89VedsfU rSMuWs+ItSRcdYJktvVAASoXHUglZhe7d/oEkRxzh1myeeYtxdpYbEqeRLes8s19mifk ELpE6E05+RSLxBOGiRYluFOB8oSeH5xsOW5BT37HCkz14v0zWcFsKDAMvNRZ9gsHjfeB KJrjVbV0FPoC7w7kLl64V2wLIAjmUoMD8xUzi4EHdEv7d+ncE5Pl2zVliqFCAEbctPEd BSFYkIDDR/CrMetZjORWoGRYKGnorS8DmMIU0xnuSTjTeFgGQYqqq/CXE3HgktQMF8/N oCSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEtYLnxC2nV1ZkvMtZqiPm08faqvVf0rf3GEf5iZyXAjFRL9y6W +pOXaWjeqYkqRV9sg2hywJxKM96fGd9d4jAJhXH9CEuz0Ck=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdXC1WFWtGoMVK9vZpcXqRggTzIdGkk6dG/yQG/ZvtBeUXvWT9PbocQdJbhDQ01k5r6mL+XcHACeLI564R5Lxk=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:9c09:: with SMTP id f9-v6mr9329908ioe.179.1532020490197; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAFsWK2du1hrF9Uxm1dMKHwJG_KPLuvQuT61sGvQ7Azhj3HOJA@mail.gmail.com> <717C4D29-AF97-4836-9F19-9E41E1646AF3@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <717C4D29-AF97-4836-9F19-9E41E1646AF3@vigilsec.com>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK239G6khSmyfkaOBxPe7LOtXNhOjx3Hxit-4LaZO7Eqfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: ekr@rtfm.com, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="00000000000026b48d05715d517e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/OZjoIu5cl-KQN3Y3va_n1GD5N6k>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (5418)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:14:55 -0000

Apologies as I'm new to the errata process.  Do I get nominated to be a
errata verifier? as there appears to be a login page before I can review
which it sounds like the WG sets up.

The documentation here <https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/> says
"The verifying party (or stream-specific party) is determined by the stream
that produced the RFC: IETF, IAB, IRTF, or Independent Submission" which I
assume is the WG.

-Wei

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:51 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> It looks like you should approve this errata.  Do you need anything else
> from the WG?
>
> Russ
>
>
> *From: *Wei Chuang <weihaw=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Subject: **Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (5418)*
> *Date: *July 11, 2018 at 5:49:16 PM EDT
> *To: *rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> *Cc: *ekr@rtfm.com, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>om>, SPASM <
> spasm@ietf.org>gt;, kaduk@mit.edu, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>om>,
> Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>om>, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
>
> Hi all,
>
> I agree with the errata report.  Background is that I've already been
> discussing with Dmitry the bug, and suggested he file the errata so we can
> make the change.  The bug is in the SmtpUTF8Mailbox OID
> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.8>
> in the example <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8398#appendix-B> found in
> the Appendix.  I also agree with him that we can update the email address
> to be consistent with the earlier example on page 6 in case the original is
> confusing.
>
> -Wei
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:46 PM RFC Errata System <
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8398,
>> "Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 Certificates".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5418
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Belyavskiy Dmitry <beldmit@gmail.com>
>>
>> Section: Appendix B
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>    This non-normative example demonstrates using SmtpUTF8Mailbox as an
>>    otherName in GeneralName to encode the email address
>>    "u+8001u+5E2B@example.com".com".
>>
>>       The hexadecimal DER encoding of the email address is:
>>       A022060A 2B060105 05070012 0809A014 0C12E880 81E5B8AB 40657861
>>       6D706C65 2E636F6D
>>
>>       The text decoding is:
>>         0  34: [0] {
>>         2  10:   OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 3 6 1 5 5 7 0 18 8 9'
>>        14  20:   [0] {
>>        16  18:     UTF8String '...@example.com'
>>              :     }
>>              :   }
>>
>>                                  Figure 2
>>
>>    The example was encoded on the OSS Nokalva ASN.1 Playground and the
>>    above text decoding is an output of Peter Gutmann's "dumpasn1"
>>    program.
>>
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>    This non-normative example demonstrates using SmtpUTF8Mailbox as an
>>    otherName in GeneralName to encode the email address
>>    "u+533Bu+751F@u+5927u+5B66.example.com <http://5b66.example.com/>".
>>
>>    The hexadecimal DER encoding of the block is:
>>    a0330608 2b060105 05070809 a0270c25 c3a5c28c c2bbc3a7 c294c29f
>>    40c3a5c2 a4c2a7c3 a5c2adc2 a62e6578 616d706c 652e636f 6d
>>
>>
>>    The text decoding is:
>>      2  51: [0] {
>>      4   8:   OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 3 6 1 5 5 7 8 9'
>>     14  39:   [0] {
>>     16  37:     UTF8String '..@...example.com'
>>           :     }
>>           :   }
>>
>>                                  Figure 2
>>
>>    The example was encoded on the OSS Nokalva ASN.1 Playground and the
>>    above text decoding is an output of Peter Gutmann's "dumpasn1"
>>    program.
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> The OID used in Appendix B does not match the OID for
>> id-on-SmtpUTF8Mailbox defined in "Appendix A.  ASN.1 Module" and is not
>> mentioned anywhere in the RFC.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8398 (draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-18)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509
>> Certificates
>> Publication Date    : May 2018
>> Author(s)           : A. Melnikov, Ed., W. Chuang, Ed.
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>