Re: [lamps] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (5418)
Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 17:14 UTC
Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D91130F72
for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01,
USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id DlcwVYclbfj0 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A94130F81
for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q9-v6so7679779ioj.8
for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=sUTPlcGcuxEI9IN5qtMkCFU4TyXOotSBZWSSFxz8Cs0=;
b=MLvfDOFwk7xTJKlg3XYJal6CvUpGS08xuVH9ViwX/WGNQC8KyDgxddUfz3GKtGXpjH
4PfS0xMuOLtPJ60zuf1wsJJ7FrZB5i3ODLDCcZn5AiIaNwlPTLJWhmhM6I5FvdLH7GxO
UYuiCyAeYA9OAXvAKLyIKkvyP55q9AS55uQAyGH7RqyS3R3UOzNrhkKXlW9cKWLW5+EM
t8Oq6eDBfAflmvzwBnjFZ/lEvjLxcWe8EuGCmBq4w/2kfZHThoMetebDo+zvEqHHzEVz
zPM8n0AJ1JwrZGYv+c9JwZ7h/onXxnY9Is2pMNTHyUiW1nwsTzWqk9YihJ8f2kACJzu1
X+JQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=sUTPlcGcuxEI9IN5qtMkCFU4TyXOotSBZWSSFxz8Cs0=;
b=lYzDoofE+wV9MK9ms4SKCEXzX0up+Ikf/PBeEnVBFzHWBdbmm281acEkyK89VedsfU
rSMuWs+ItSRcdYJktvVAASoXHUglZhe7d/oEkRxzh1myeeYtxdpYbEqeRLes8s19mifk
ELpE6E05+RSLxBOGiRYluFOB8oSeH5xsOW5BT37HCkz14v0zWcFsKDAMvNRZ9gsHjfeB
KJrjVbV0FPoC7w7kLl64V2wLIAjmUoMD8xUzi4EHdEv7d+ncE5Pl2zVliqFCAEbctPEd
BSFYkIDDR/CrMetZjORWoGRYKGnorS8DmMIU0xnuSTjTeFgGQYqqq/CXE3HgktQMF8/N
oCSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEtYLnxC2nV1ZkvMtZqiPm08faqvVf0rf3GEf5iZyXAjFRL9y6W
+pOXaWjeqYkqRV9sg2hywJxKM96fGd9d4jAJhXH9CEuz0Ck=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdXC1WFWtGoMVK9vZpcXqRggTzIdGkk6dG/yQG/ZvtBeUXvWT9PbocQdJbhDQ01k5r6mL+XcHACeLI564R5Lxk=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:9c09:: with SMTP id
f9-v6mr9329908ioe.179.1532020490197;
Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAFsWK2du1hrF9Uxm1dMKHwJG_KPLuvQuT61sGvQ7Azhj3HOJA@mail.gmail.com>
<717C4D29-AF97-4836-9F19-9E41E1646AF3@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <717C4D29-AF97-4836-9F19-9E41E1646AF3@vigilsec.com>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:14:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK239G6khSmyfkaOBxPe7LOtXNhOjx3Hxit-4LaZO7Eqfg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: ekr@rtfm.com, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
micalg=sha-256; boundary="00000000000026b48d05715d517e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/OZjoIu5cl-KQN3Y3va_n1GD5N6k>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (5418)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime
\(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>,
<mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>,
<mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:14:55 -0000
Apologies as I'm new to the errata process. Do I get nominated to be a errata verifier? as there appears to be a login page before I can review which it sounds like the WG sets up. The documentation here <https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/> says "The verifying party (or stream-specific party) is determined by the stream that produced the RFC: IETF, IAB, IRTF, or Independent Submission" which I assume is the WG. -Wei On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:51 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote: > It looks like you should approve this errata. Do you need anything else > from the WG? > > Russ > > > *From: *Wei Chuang <weihaw=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> > *Subject: **Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (5418)* > *Date: *July 11, 2018 at 5:49:16 PM EDT > *To: *rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > *Cc: *ekr@rtfm.com, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>om>, SPASM < > spasm@ietf.org>gt;, kaduk@mit.edu, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>om>, > Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>om>, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com > > Hi all, > > I agree with the errata report. Background is that I've already been > discussing with Dmitry the bug, and suggested he file the errata so we can > make the change. The bug is in the SmtpUTF8Mailbox OID > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.8> > in the example <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8398#appendix-B> found in > the Appendix. I also agree with him that we can update the email address > to be consistent with the earlier example on page 6 in case the original is > confusing. > > -Wei > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:46 PM RFC Errata System < > rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8398, >> "Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 Certificates". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5418 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Belyavskiy Dmitry <beldmit@gmail.com> >> >> Section: Appendix B >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> This non-normative example demonstrates using SmtpUTF8Mailbox as an >> otherName in GeneralName to encode the email address >> "u+8001u+5E2B@example.com".com". >> >> The hexadecimal DER encoding of the email address is: >> A022060A 2B060105 05070012 0809A014 0C12E880 81E5B8AB 40657861 >> 6D706C65 2E636F6D >> >> The text decoding is: >> 0 34: [0] { >> 2 10: OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 3 6 1 5 5 7 0 18 8 9' >> 14 20: [0] { >> 16 18: UTF8String '...@example.com' >> : } >> : } >> >> Figure 2 >> >> The example was encoded on the OSS Nokalva ASN.1 Playground and the >> above text decoding is an output of Peter Gutmann's "dumpasn1" >> program. >> >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> This non-normative example demonstrates using SmtpUTF8Mailbox as an >> otherName in GeneralName to encode the email address >> "u+533Bu+751F@u+5927u+5B66.example.com <http://5b66.example.com/>". >> >> The hexadecimal DER encoding of the block is: >> a0330608 2b060105 05070809 a0270c25 c3a5c28c c2bbc3a7 c294c29f >> 40c3a5c2 a4c2a7c3 a5c2adc2 a62e6578 616d706c 652e636f 6d >> >> >> The text decoding is: >> 2 51: [0] { >> 4 8: OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 3 6 1 5 5 7 8 9' >> 14 39: [0] { >> 16 37: UTF8String '..@...example.com' >> : } >> : } >> >> Figure 2 >> >> The example was encoded on the OSS Nokalva ASN.1 Playground and the >> above text decoding is an output of Peter Gutmann's "dumpasn1" >> program. >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The OID used in Appendix B does not match the OID for >> id-on-SmtpUTF8Mailbox defined in "Appendix A. ASN.1 Module" and is not >> mentioned anywhere in the RFC. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC8398 (draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-18) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Internationalized Email Addresses in X.509 >> Certificates >> Publication Date : May 2018 >> Author(s) : A. Melnikov, Ed., W. Chuang, Ed. >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME >> Area : Security >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> > _______________________________________________ > Spasm mailing list > Spasm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm > > > _______________________________________________ > Spasm mailing list > Spasm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm >
- [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (5418) RFC Errata System
- Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 (… Wei Chuang
- [lamps] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8398 … Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8… Wei Chuang
- Re: [lamps] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8… Russ Housley