[lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG document?
Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Fri, 17 November 2017 20:41 UTC
Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809FC120454 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:41:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8wi5o8_to-1 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:41:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 078591200B9 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:41:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To; bh=Gfwtyupm4NVLq1nB0K4+8Mfm6DmRnsblLaBBnap6Blg=; b=r/5w1I8igQ2JmqBTF6jW5C8WAGCUGVwfG5NmlSBYVWFSny9aXYU3VHnK/Plq6FpJOpU8exAcCVXHFXomv3aiM7dSI9/2FQE9UBJOE9W4Jv0qfW/8A4Lsr7dEGsdOIwBqG9sESmqxtom0Mlfwb5ncRqNlVmsbo50V/ixDkFGC1Rs=;
Received: ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:40:59 -0800
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <84e6d5a2-4a51-8993-00ef-56be4e1c04be@eff.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:41:02 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/OaW3rDlZNlM4z5ZoLdbnqf7OECI>
Subject: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG document?
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:41:05 -0000
At the WG session at IETF100 we took a hum on standardizing the CAA implementation that's current in production, i.e. the contents of https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification-02.txt. Currently that's published as an individual draft. What steps do we need to take to turn that into a WG document so we can make progress towards an RFC? Thanks, Jacob
- [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG documen… Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
- Re: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG doc… Jim Schaad
- Re: [lamps] Moving caa-simplification to a WG doc… Russ Housley