IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Draft addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter

Hernâni Marques (p≡p project) <hernani@pep-project.org> Thu, 10 January 2019 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <hernani@pep-project.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B7E131218 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:54:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hl5kWu45EwVE for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:54:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.pibit.ch (dragon.pibit.ch [94.231.81.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896C1130E69 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:54:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.pibit.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4D7171C069 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:54:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dragon.pibit.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dragon.pibit.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HvabR0OwogFT for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:54:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.0.46] (77-56-100-105.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.56.100.105]) by dragon.pibit.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12D59171C057 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:54:31 +0100 (CET)
To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <DC188C55-6FDE-4E64-9151-54815E96B50B@vigilsec.com> <87bm5hxdn0.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <1194C123-1234-4B86-8EC1-26CE577CAFDA@vigilsec.com> <BB06AD4F-5F6F-4986-9ADC-04B44E34D0DE@vigilsec.com>
From: "Hernâni Marques (p≡p project)" <hernani@pep-project.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <cf5d99c5-7e57-6b97-3a51-d18f0f3152b3@pep-project.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:54:29 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BB06AD4F-5F6F-4986-9ADC-04B44E34D0DE@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0A8gzuggOSJepxx2VspAEwV7VcPuHtZpx"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Ozyl5_amWtxu48l0N_39PtwuIxg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Draft addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:54:38 -0000

On 10.01.19 19:21, Russ Housley wrote:

> We seem to have moved on to other topics.  Does that mean we have settled on the text we want the IESG to add to the charter?
> 
>    7. Cryptographic protection of electronic mail headers: A
>    mechanism to address this in S/MIME has been standardized
>    in RFC 5751. The WG shall define solutions (both for
>    signature and encryption) to close significant privacy,
>    security and usability gaps in cryptographically-protected
>    electronic mail.

For me fine.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email