IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C65130DC0 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:51:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-yzxCvRFlhB for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC1912785F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2618300AA7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:51:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id N7fYYS9e2Hii for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:51:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.138.155]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51F893004FE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 22:51:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Message-Id: <3653FE62-CD11-47D1-A9DB-5C6FF4AD8498@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 22:50:59 -0500
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/PgzLjPcg-jfywQFQs9gMLFcgRd8>
Subject: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 03:51:09 -0000

The SECDISPATCH WG met on Tuesday afternoon, and they made this recommendation:

>  draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-01 -- re-charter LAMPS WG to accept this draft

Three questions:

1) Do you support the addition of this work to the LAMPS charter?

2) If it is added, would you review the document?

3) If it results in an RFC, would you implement?

Russ & Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email