[lamps] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-05-01: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 20 May 2021 10:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: lamps-chairs@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <162150740897.25549.15327642978872996058@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 03:43:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Q24KkdULTX6-HnmX90QJkUwEKf0>
Subject: [lamps] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-lamps-05-01: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-lamps-05-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lamps/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

PQC is of course a must but I wonder why in 5.a only the US NIST algorithms
will be used ? Can we use a wording as in 5.b (i.e., not limiting ourself to US
NIST) ?

Regards

-éric

[lamps] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-iet… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Re: [lamps] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter… Roman Danyliw
Re: [lamps] [EXTERNAL] Éric Vyncke's No Objection… Mike Ounsworth