From nobody Wed Dec 28 06:59:35 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDBDC14CF01 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 06:59:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGPIbW951q0m for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 06:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-fw-6002.amazon.com (smtp-fw-6002.amazon.com [52.95.49.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF121C1522C2 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 06:59:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1672239568; x=1703775568; h=from:to:cc:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=hKYA0IMvRzmVKyuJl6ZkTuSwEts+XZmYduM01YpnWRE=; b=qbhePLDSlP+4F6/+LQze3pMIn9yfImc/ywvH2Im1UAYN4kqaWGJwyUY4 CbZGRRVE4gz1o43s0ohwSJsxBriheFk/ylDEXY/+9DrTN6IwJgPMpDlHJ beMnJedzg9138IVo3SwI0TwzS2sgDtYzISmnbAAm5bLHg8nzKu9a4KGLO 4=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,281,1665446400"; d="scan'208";a="281486334" Thread-Topic: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288) Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-iad-1d-m6i4x-e651a362.us-east-1.amazon.com) ([10.43.8.6]) by smtp-border-fw-6002.iad6.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Dec 2022 14:59:25 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com (iad12-ws-svc-p26-lb9-vlan3.iad.amazon.com [10.40.163.38]) by email-inbound-relay-iad-1d-m6i4x-e651a362.us-east-1.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E37D83301; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EX19D001ANA003.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.188) by EX13MTAUWB001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.161.249) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:20 +0000 Received: from EX19D001ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.156) by EX19D001ANA003.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.188) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1118.20; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:19 +0000 Received: from EX19D001ANA001.ant.amazon.com ([fe80::4f78:75cd:3117:8055]) by EX19D001ANA001.ant.amazon.com ([fe80::4f78:75cd:3117:8055%5]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.020; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:19 +0000 From: "Kampanakis, Panos" To: RFC Errata System , "quynh.dang@nist.gov" , "rdd@cert.org" , "paul.wouters@aiven.io" , "housley@vigilsec.com" , "tim.hollebeek@digicert.com" CC: "ietf104729@di-mgt.com.au" , "spasm@ietf.org" Thread-Index: AQHZGTLbYQi5VJX//U2aUs3jOadQeK6DZtpA Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20221226140309.320A1AFB68@rfcpa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20221226140309.320A1AFB68@rfcpa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.37.240.172] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288) X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:59:32 -0000 Unfortunately, this is a valid erratum. It was a nit in the text, we should= have said=20 " SHAKE128 or SHAKE256 output ..." Thanks to David for finding it.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Spasm On Behalf Of RFC Errata System Sent: Monday, December 26, 2022 9:03 AM To: pkampana@cisco.com; quynh.dang@nist.gov; rdd@cert.org; paul.wouters@aiv= en.io; housley@vigilsec.com; tim.hollebeek@digicert.com Cc: ietf104729@di-mgt.com.au; spasm@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8702 (7288) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not cli= ck links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the= content is safe. The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8702, "Use of the SHA= KE One-Way Hash Functions in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7288 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: David Ireland Section: 3.4 Original Text ------------- If absent, the SHAKE256 output length used in KMAC is 32 or 64 bytes, respectively, Corrected Text -------------- If absent, the SHAKE128 or SHAKE256 output length used in KMAC is 32 or 64 = bytes, respectively, Notes ----- The adverb 'Respectively' requires two parallel structures. SHAKE128=3D>32,= SHAKE256=3D>64. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "R= eply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a deci= sion is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and ed= it the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8702 (draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-18) -------------------------------------- Title : Use of the SHAKE One-Way Hash Functions in the Crypto= graphic Message Syntax (CMS) Publication Date : January 2020 Author(s) : P. Kampanakis, Q. Dang Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Spasm mailing list Spasm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm