Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 02 September 2021 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B643A098B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mtFvfatZIdEe for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74023A098A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C725E300C1C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:09:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NoKmLlyp09jR for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6726300C09; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:09:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <5AE77028-9076-4385-B9C8-2B2A5E82BEA4@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EF4D5438-4A04-4248-B9AD-2B898D51EB78"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:09:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3AFE036D-3EA9-4C56-A589-97A59289AAA3@gmail.com>
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CBE95F06-7678-4D63-B39E-D66DDFC2906D@vigilsec.com> <D99E74D7-08C5-4851-8B98-A1F3746C9B74@vigilsec.com> <3AFE036D-3EA9-4C56-A589-97A59289AAA3@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/QH3ciIYKAjWEl1gAz47Cwr7lXhY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Doodle poll to find a date for the LAMPS Virtual Interim Focused on PQC
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 20:09:17 -0000

Yoav:

There was another Doodle going on for the STIR WG as well,  Since I need to be at both sessions, I have been trying to make sure that they do not land at the same time.  Getting all of the needed responses to both poll has required more nudging than I expected.  Perhaps it is just so many people taking holiday in August.

This has just been sorted out.  They landed on the same date, but different times.

I have just submitted the request for the meeting slot at 14:00 UTC on 13 September 2021.  It should be announced by the Secretariat soon.

It will be here:  https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=8955afa4-060b-4480-9986-07fe51113a0d 

Russ
      

> On Sep 2, 2021, at 3:52 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Whatever happened with this? 
> 
> As far as I can tell, this was the last message on the list about a PQC focused interim. Nor was such a meeting mentioned the the CSRAttr interim that we did have.
> 
> Yoav
> 
>> On 14 Aug 2021, at 23:52, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> It looks like September 13th is preferred.  We will make the decision on Monday or Tuesday.  If you have not responded, please do so now.
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:04 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We did not include PQC on the agenda for IETF 111 because we wanted to dedicate a whole virtual interim to the topic.  This pool is to find a time in the first two weeks of September.  Please provide your availabily promptly so we can get the meeting scheduled.
>>> 
>>> 	https://doodle.com/poll/3m8ca2yyfvttb78w <https://doodle.com/poll/3m8ca2yyfvttb78w>
>>> 
>>> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>>> Russ
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spasm mailing list
>> Spasm@ietf.org <mailto:Spasm@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>