IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 11 March 2018 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFE6124B18 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 18:28:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHO1tVYOvs-L for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 18:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96AA8124234 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 18:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4011C300558 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:28:05 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gd9fMW-pkm-t for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:28:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 269C23004D7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:28:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:28:09 -0500
References: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <52115BCB-49E9-4094-B8EA-17279E70F6B0@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/R6b5dUJWiQWk9NGeJ8VM873QjPo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 02:28:09 -0000

No one has spoken against adopting this I-D.  After discussion of this document in London, please post the next revision as draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-00.

Russ



> On Feb 24, 2018, at 14:28, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Should draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification be adopted by the LAMPS WG as the starting point for rfc6844bis?
> 
> Please voice you opinion by March 10th.
> 
> Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email