From nobody Thu Jun 16 14:38:57 2022
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B45BC15AE2D;
 Thu, 16 Jun 2022 14:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.657
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id EODkc0jePGfX; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 14:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BA05C14F735;
 Thu, 16 Jun 2022 14:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499)
 id E599CCD7F2; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 14:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, dkg@fifthhorseman.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20220616213847.E599CCD7F2@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 14:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/RDa5ljSIsnPlUrKunFQdetTyA9Y>
Subject: [lamps] [Errata Verified] RFC9216 (6993)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime
 \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>,
 <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>,
 <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 21:38:52 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC9216,
"S/MIME Example Keys and Certificates". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6993

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date Reported: 2022-06-15
Verified by: RFC Editor  

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
Email Address:  dna@smime.example

Corrected Text
--------------
Email Address:  dana@smime.example

Notes
-----
Decoding the certificate shoes that the Subject Alternative Name contains an email address of dana@smime.example.

--------------------------------------
RFC9216 (draft-ietf-lamps-samples-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : S/MIME Example Keys and Certificates
Publication Date    : April 2022
Author(s)           : D. K. Gillmor, Ed.
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF