IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WGLC comments draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-01

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 17 September 2018 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F15D130DFF for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cgO7VYkORUa0 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48492124D68 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7963300AA4 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:00:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id nE4699vKUdPA for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:00:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from new-host-5.home (pool-71-127-50-4.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.127.50.4]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73FFE300258; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:00:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <A59E0541-5277-4B8F-AED3-ACF52E0F38F1@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B29FB8AC-988C-45D7-9607-9A27CB6D9A2C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:00:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <01ca01d44ebf$86141490$923c3db0$@augustcellars.com>
Cc: Panos Kampanakis <pkampana@cisco.com>, Quynh Dang <quynh.dang@nist.gov>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
References: <00be01d42b65$b8452ee0$28cf8ca0$@augustcellars.com> <DM6PR09MB274668C47815881BE3159EB7F3020@DM6PR09MB2746.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <086101d44538$2c0d47e0$8427d7a0$@augustcellars.com> <DM6PR09MB274676943D27C9D6CD80221AF3020@DM6PR09MB2746.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <087301d44543$390807e0$ab1817a0$@augustcellars.com> <DM6PR09MB274607D636D86A71778431D7F3020@DM6PR09MB2746.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <09C752C4-CF6C-4455-961F-6121D07B9F1A@vigilsec.com> <019201d44e9c$827ad620$87708260$@augustcellars.com> <e1ebcfeb9d09415bad5647a0edad73c9@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <1F5FD70A-34B4-41EE-86A7-F1848D2B7DA8@vigilsec.com> <01ca01d44ebf$86141490$923c3db0$@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/UqfuYaf8c7I7WxXBmgJpQueX4E8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WGLC comments draft-ietf-lamps-cms-shakes-01
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:00:34 -0000

I sent the query.  For those who are not on the CFRG list, the archive message is here:

	https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/VVm9BQZSOHpaFR4ZQMQPUFtgjOk <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/VVm9BQZSOHpaFR4ZQMQPUFtgjOk>

Russ


> On Sep 17, 2018, at 3:49 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> 
> While it does look like a simple substitution, I do not think the LAMPS is the right group to make the assessment.  CFRG may have people with the right skills.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email