Re: [lamps] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 10 January 2018 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB5512D893 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:00:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cj51sg7DtMJf for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8C612D947 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18D3300A02 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:00:31 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 0KxqcncB0Ixy for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:00:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DBBB3004AA; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:00:25 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <151556057406.21417.16858044663291002517.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:00:28 -0500
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2E9CD715-B354-4A68-A9A4-45EB03A18117@vigilsec.com>
References: <151556057406.21417.16858044663291002517.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/V5pDKMWKxWY4jC_PTXStvtkPsbY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:00:35 -0000

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for your work on this document. One thing I noticed is that the name for
> what I presume is an early registration at IANA ("id-on-smtputf8Name") varies
> from the final name used in this document ("id-on-smtputf8Mailbox"). I would
> ask the authors and shepherd to please carefully review the final IANA
> registrations upon document approval to ensure this is updated appropriately.

https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.8

At this point, the entry is already in the IANA registry.  I wonder if it is worth the confusion to change it.

Russ