Re: [lamps] [IANA #1237862] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku (smi-numbers)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 10 August 2022 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B86C1907B3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t0Q_fB772Zdd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A86A7C1907B2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BBFC5323; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EFC5C5053; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <AB369744-4199-464E-B6C7-63600A3AEC38@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A2975B3D-347E-44C1-B9E3-653F71067332"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:02:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-30923-1660155139-1451.1237862-9-0@icann.org>
Cc: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
References: <RT-Ticket-1237862@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-21468-1660154312-319.1237862-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-30923-1660155139-1451.1237862-9-0@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/V6DzI6Lz9nJz2FFuzhSljZAztTc>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [IANA #1237862] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku (smi-numbers)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:02:17 -0000

Sabrina:

Please proceed with assigning both object identifiers.

In https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3 <https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3>, please assign id-kp-documentSigning.  The next available value appears to be 36.

In https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7. <https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3>0, please assign id-mod-docsign-eku. The next available value appears to be 104.

Russ

> On Aug 10, 2022, at 2:12 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Russ (cc: lamps WG),  
> 
> Can you review the SMI Security for PKIX Extended Key Purpose and PKIX Module Identifier registrations in Section 7 of this document for us? 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku
> 
> If you're available, the due date for this one is August 24th. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Sabrina