[lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-8410-ku-clarifications-01

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 01 April 2022 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE8C3A0EBD for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 09:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dVmes5XnoynL for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE653A1189 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 09:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2EDDFFEB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:37:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A0D51402B0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:37:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Message-Id: <FD9DC3E8-E847-40CA-9490-EC708D500C72@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:37:39 -0400
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/WePl6DOhHRwsAQWZMtYNUTtD8pQ>
Subject: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-8410-ku-clarifications-01
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:38:48 -0000

Title: Clarifications for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519, and X448 Algorithm Identifiers

Authors: S. Turner, S Josefsson, D, McCarney, T. Ito

Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-8410-ku-clarifications

This document updates RFC 8410 to clarify existing and specify missing semantics for key usage bits when used in certificates that support the Ed25519, Ed448, X25519, and X448 Elliptic Curve Cryptography algorithms.

Please respond to this WG last Call by 18 April 2022.

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
Russ